Hari Om Moter Body

Veerpur, Dungarpur, Rajasthan

Payment Terms :

Packaging Details : THE PIC WILL BE GO IN FACTORY FOR MAKING BODY FOR 10 DAYS

Delivery Time : 10 DAYS

Payment Terms :

Packaging Details : Body-on-frame
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigationJump to search

A ladder frame

A 2007 Toyota Tundra chassis holding the vehicle's engine, drivetrain, suspension and wheels.

The BMW i3 electric car is one of the rare modern cars with a separate body and frame design (2013).

A Model T chassis ready for its body

All steel chassis and all steel body
Body by Edward G Budd Manufacturing Company of Philadelphia for John and Horace Dodge[1]
Body-on-frame is an automobile construction method where a separate body is mounted on a relatively rigid vehicle frame or chassis carrying the powertrain (the engine and drivetrain). While this was the original method of building automobiles, body-on-frame construction is now used mainly for pickup trucks and (mostly full size) SUVs.

In the late 19th century the frames, like those of the carriages they replaced, might be made of wood (commonly ash), reinforced by steel flitch plates but in the early 20th century steel ladder frames or chassis rapidly became standard. Mass production of all-metal bodies began with the Budd Company and the Dodge Brothers. Mass production of all-metal bodies became general in the 1920s but Europe, with exceptions, followed almost a decade later. Europe's custom-made or "coachbuilt" cars usually contained some wood framing or used aluminium alloy castings.

In contrast, Unibody or monocoque designs, where panels within the body supported the car on its suspension, were developed by European manufacturers in the late 1920s with Budd USA (which had a number of large factories in Europe) and its technical knowhow; but not in USA until the 1950s and generally later. Because of the high cost of designing and developing these structures and the high cost of specialised machinery to make the large pressings required by this style of construction it is not used by low-volume manufacturers, who might construct an equivalent by welding steel tube to form a suitable space frame.


Contents
1 History
2 Advantages and disadvantages
2.1 Advantages
2.2 Disadvantages
3 Examples
4 See also
5 References
6 External links
History
The Ford Model T carried the tradition of body-on-frame over from horse-drawn buggies, helping to facilitate high volume manufacturing on a moving assembly line.[2] In the United States, frequent changes in automotive design made it necessary to use a ladder frame rather than unibody construction to make it possible to change the design without having to change the chassis, allowing frequent changes and improvements to the car's bodywork and interior (where they were most noticeable to customers) while leaving the chassis and driveline unchanged, and thus keeping costs down and design times short. It was also easy to use the same chassis and driveline for several very different cars. Especially in the days before computer-aided design, this was an advantage.[3]

Most small passenger vehicles switched to unibody construction by the end of the 1930s. The trend had started with cars like the Citroen Traction Avant (1934) and Opel Olympia (a General Motors design) introduced in 1935. Trucks, bus manufacturers and large low volume cars or those made in the United States continued to use separate bodies on "conventional" frames. Body-on-frame remains the preferred construction method for heavy-duty commercial vehicles (especially those intended to carry or pull heavy loads, such as trucks and some sport utility vehicles (SUVs)) but as production volumes rise increasing numbers of SUVs and crossover SUVs are switching to unibody frames. Mass-market manufacturers Ford, General Motors and Chrysler are abandoning true body-on-frame SUVs, opting, when sales volume permits, for more efficient unibody construction.[4] Toyota currently manufactures the most body-on-frame SUVs with the 4Runner, Sequoia, Land Cruiser, Lexus GX and LX followed by Nissan with the Patrol, Armada, and Infiniti QX56/80.[5] The Ford Panther platform, which was discontinued in 2011, was the last series of traditional passenger cars to be built in this manner.

One variant used by Chevrolet for its Corvette incorporates the inner skeleton to the frame.

An intermediate to full monocoque construction was the 'semi-monocoque' used by the Volkswagen Beetle and Renault 4. These used a lightweight separate chassis made from pressed sheet steel panels forming a 'platform chassis', to give the benefits of a traditional chassis, but with lower weight and greater stiffness. Both of these chassis were used for several different models. The mid-1930s designed Volkswagen made use of the bodyshell for structural strength as well as the chassis hence 'semi-monocoque'. Traditionally chassis had "compliance", they were designed to allow some twisting. As suspensions improved they could not perform correctly unless supporting a rigid structure like that intended to be provided by unibody or monocoque construction.

The Lincoln Town Car once dominated the American limousine market because it was the last American luxury car made on the body-on-frame system and was easily lengthened for livery work. With the Town Car discontinued since 2011, the de facto replacement is the Lincoln Navigator SUV.

Advantages and disadvantages

This section needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.
Find sources: "Body-on-frame" news newspapers books scholar JSTOR (January 2017) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Advantages
Easier to design, build and modify. Frames can be streamlined to accommodate different body designs, cutting costs and manufacturing requirements.
Less noise while traveling, because the groans squeaks and rattles normally associated with bodywork movement due to stresses and strains are not heard so much, and road noise from tires is more "distant, " all due to the bodywork being isolated from the chassis by rubber pads around the attachment bolts, or by suspending the body on the chassis.
Easier to repair after accidents. Body damage is less structurally critical; meaning panels can often be replaced more easily and the vehicle returned to a "road worthy" status more quickly. Where as a unibody vehicle may require specialist repairs, resulting in long delays before the vehicle is operable again.
Can allow more torsional flexing before yielding (trucks, truck-base SUVs, off roading)[6]
Vehicles mounted high on a separate chassis such as trucks and true off-road SUVs are less likely to suffer damage from rust caused by dampness, mud, stones, road grit, water, snow, and other more serious damage like the transmission or engine oil sump damage often caused by rocks.

Austin A40 Sports, ca 1951. The aluminium on ash bodies were built under contract by Jensen Motors (of West Bromwich) and transported to Austin's Longbridge plant for final assembly.[7]
Disadvantages
The complete vehicle will often be heavier than a unibody design, resulting in diminished performance and higher fuel consumption.
Body-on-frame vehicles with high ground clearance such as trucks and true off-road SUVs have high centers of gravity, compromising their on-road performance.
Torsional flexing during cornering can compromise the handling and road grip.
Many older body-on-frame vehicles have no inbuilt crumple zones, so their crashworthiness is below that of a unibody with crumple zones.
Examples
The following is a list of production cars, SUVs, and light-duty pickup trucks available in the United States that currently have a body-on-frame construction. The list is divided by vehicle category.

Passenger Car
BMW i3
BMW i8
SUV

Cadillac Escalade (ESV)
Chevrolet Suburban
Chevrolet Tahoe
Chevrolet Trailblazer
Ford Everest
Ford Expedition (Max)
GMC Yukon (XL)
Infiniti QX80
Jeep Wrangler (Unlimited)
Lexus GX
Lexus LX
Lincoln Navigator (L)
Mercedes-Benz G-Class
Nissan Terra
Nissan Armada
Suzuki Jimny
Toyota 4Runner
Toyota Land Cruiser
Toyota Land Cruiser Prado
Toyota Sequoia
Mahindra Thar
Pickup Truck

Chevrolet Colorado
Chevrolet Silverado
Ford F-150
Ford Ranger
GMC Canyon
GMC Sierra
Jeep Gladiator
Nissan Frontier
Nissan Titan
Ram 1500
Toyota Tacoma
Toyota Tundra
MPV Mahindra Marazzo M2, M4(+), M6(+), M8

See also
Vehicle frame
Coachwork
Spaceframe
Subframe
Superleggera
Backbone chassis
Exoskeleton car
References
page 106, George A Oliver, A History of Coachbuilding, Cassell, London, 1962
Great Moments in Body-on-Frame Car Construction WSJ, May 2, 2014
Sawyer, Christopher A. (2009-06-02). "Framing the question Automotive Design & Production Find Articles at BNET". Findarticles.com. Archived from the original on 2009-02-11. Retrieved 2009-12-08.
"Car Reviews, New and Used Car Prices, Photos and Videos - MSN Autos". editorial.autos.msn.com. Archived from the original on 6 January 2014. Retrieved 10 April 2018.
"Toyota reaffirms commitment to body-on-frame SUVs". autoblog.com. Retrieved 10 April 2018.
"Body-on-Frame vs. Unibody Construction - Web2Carz". web2carz.com. 15 August 2013. Retrieved 10 April 2018.
"Austin A40 Sports". Austin Memories. Archived from the original on 2009-01-05.

Delivery Time : 10 DAYS